As we all know, the name of the pesticide product is "dirty". According to the new regulations of the Ministry of Agriculture, from January 8 this year, the Ministry of Agriculture has stopped approving the names of pesticide products. Starting from July 1, the pesticide products produced will not be allowed to use product names; the names of pesticides shall all use common names or be simplified. The common name, the directly used health pesticide uses the functional description word and the dosage form as the product name; the Ministry of Agriculture identified 2008 as the year of pesticide registration management. This series of regulations has caused some old pesticide companies to lose their role in the names of pesticide products.
According to the understanding of pesticide companies and the pesticide market, due to the original regulations, there are no uniform regulations on the nomenclature and labeling of pesticide products, resulting in very confusing product names, label types, locations, and sizes. The phenomenon of “more than one drug†is very prominent. Cai Daoji, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and a researcher at the Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences of the State Environmental Protection Administration, said that there is only one generic name for the same pesticide, but different manufacturers have used a variety of trade names. Like the same agent, imidacloprid, there are more than 700 names such as "killer", "hard state", "dead", and "sweeping" appear on the counter. Not to mention farmers, people who are engaged in pesticide research are also confused. Pesticides have not changed their names, and they have become new pesticides with new raw materials and ingredients unchanged.
Pesticide production is a support for the agriculture industry, but the abuse of flashy product names has brought about the consequences of pit farmers. According to reports from plant protection stations all over the country, because farmers do not know the terminology of pesticides, it is easy to put on the name of the commodity, and some have spent a lot of money on common drugs, and some have repeatedly purchased and used pesticides with the same ingredients. What's more serious is that some pesticides that use beautiful commodity names have extremely poor control of pests and diseases, causing large economic losses to farmers. For example, silkworm farmers in the mountains of Zhejiang Province used a pesticide for mulberry trees last year. The name of the product was new, but high-toxic banned pesticides were added inside. A large number of silkworms died after being used without the knowledge of the farmers.
According to relevant persons from the Ministry of Agriculture, China is a large country with pesticides, but there are many pesticide companies, small scales, high costs, serious product homogeneity, and oversupply of low-grade products, which has caused the profitability of the pesticide industry to decline. Therefore, giving the pesticide a brand name that has caught people's attention has become a channel for some companies to open up the market. These manufacturers relied on the bells and whistles of commodity names to look for sales, which also caused an increase in vicious competition in the market. The Ministry of Agriculture's determination to carry out this reform is an important measure based on the current situation of pesticide management, and it is also in line with the current situation of agricultural and rural economic development. It is expected that after the new regulations are put in place, the names of pesticide products can be reduced from the current 16,000 to 1700, and the number of pesticide registrations will also be significantly reduced.
Some large pesticide companies such as Nantong Jiangshan Pesticide Chemicals Co., Ltd. and Red Sun Group, Jiangsu Province's famous pesticide companies, have reported that the cancellation of trade names has a great impact on those pesticide companies that rely on consumer The overall development of the industry is greatly beneficial. First, the interests of law-abiding, quality-surviving pesticide companies have been protected. The name of the pesticide is standardized, the price and quality of the pesticide can be stabilized and regulated, and it is beneficial for the company to establish a brand. For example, the trade names “Gongdaâ€, “Gongcao Ningâ€, “Bendaâ€, and “Gao Ke Ling†of glyphosate are all cancelled. The consumers will note the name of the company and the brand from the quality of glyphosate. Such as "Xiang glyphosate", "Jiangshan glyphosate", "Hua Xing glyphosate" and so on. The heads of Nantong Jiangshan and Hongshang Sun also stated that the removal of pesticides from commodity names will play a positive role in promoting these large enterprises that rely on quality to win, and will encourage large enterprises to further improve their technological innovation and save energy and reduce consumption. , To improve the quality of products and to offer genuine pesticides to consumers. At the same time, all manufacturers of the same product are in a unified starting line than the quality, than the service, is conducive to healthy competition among enterprises. Third, it is conducive to the sale of quality products. Commodity names often exaggerate the word and deceive consumers. This makes law-abiding businesses have to invest a lot of manpower and money to promote, promote sales, and compete with companies that live by their brand names. The introduction of a new policy for canceling brand names will play a positive role in regulating sales and balancing prices.
In short, the cancellation of the trade name and the implementation of a drug can only restore the original appearance of the pesticide. It can truly purify the pesticide market, create a safe drug use environment for consumers, and open up a healthy environment for the development of the enterprise.
According to the understanding of pesticide companies and the pesticide market, due to the original regulations, there are no uniform regulations on the nomenclature and labeling of pesticide products, resulting in very confusing product names, label types, locations, and sizes. The phenomenon of “more than one drug†is very prominent. Cai Daoji, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and a researcher at the Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences of the State Environmental Protection Administration, said that there is only one generic name for the same pesticide, but different manufacturers have used a variety of trade names. Like the same agent, imidacloprid, there are more than 700 names such as "killer", "hard state", "dead", and "sweeping" appear on the counter. Not to mention farmers, people who are engaged in pesticide research are also confused. Pesticides have not changed their names, and they have become new pesticides with new raw materials and ingredients unchanged.
Pesticide production is a support for the agriculture industry, but the abuse of flashy product names has brought about the consequences of pit farmers. According to reports from plant protection stations all over the country, because farmers do not know the terminology of pesticides, it is easy to put on the name of the commodity, and some have spent a lot of money on common drugs, and some have repeatedly purchased and used pesticides with the same ingredients. What's more serious is that some pesticides that use beautiful commodity names have extremely poor control of pests and diseases, causing large economic losses to farmers. For example, silkworm farmers in the mountains of Zhejiang Province used a pesticide for mulberry trees last year. The name of the product was new, but high-toxic banned pesticides were added inside. A large number of silkworms died after being used without the knowledge of the farmers.
According to relevant persons from the Ministry of Agriculture, China is a large country with pesticides, but there are many pesticide companies, small scales, high costs, serious product homogeneity, and oversupply of low-grade products, which has caused the profitability of the pesticide industry to decline. Therefore, giving the pesticide a brand name that has caught people's attention has become a channel for some companies to open up the market. These manufacturers relied on the bells and whistles of commodity names to look for sales, which also caused an increase in vicious competition in the market. The Ministry of Agriculture's determination to carry out this reform is an important measure based on the current situation of pesticide management, and it is also in line with the current situation of agricultural and rural economic development. It is expected that after the new regulations are put in place, the names of pesticide products can be reduced from the current 16,000 to 1700, and the number of pesticide registrations will also be significantly reduced.
Some large pesticide companies such as Nantong Jiangshan Pesticide Chemicals Co., Ltd. and Red Sun Group, Jiangsu Province's famous pesticide companies, have reported that the cancellation of trade names has a great impact on those pesticide companies that rely on consumer The overall development of the industry is greatly beneficial. First, the interests of law-abiding, quality-surviving pesticide companies have been protected. The name of the pesticide is standardized, the price and quality of the pesticide can be stabilized and regulated, and it is beneficial for the company to establish a brand. For example, the trade names “Gongdaâ€, “Gongcao Ningâ€, “Bendaâ€, and “Gao Ke Ling†of glyphosate are all cancelled. The consumers will note the name of the company and the brand from the quality of glyphosate. Such as "Xiang glyphosate", "Jiangshan glyphosate", "Hua Xing glyphosate" and so on. The heads of Nantong Jiangshan and Hongshang Sun also stated that the removal of pesticides from commodity names will play a positive role in promoting these large enterprises that rely on quality to win, and will encourage large enterprises to further improve their technological innovation and save energy and reduce consumption. , To improve the quality of products and to offer genuine pesticides to consumers. At the same time, all manufacturers of the same product are in a unified starting line than the quality, than the service, is conducive to healthy competition among enterprises. Third, it is conducive to the sale of quality products. Commodity names often exaggerate the word and deceive consumers. This makes law-abiding businesses have to invest a lot of manpower and money to promote, promote sales, and compete with companies that live by their brand names. The introduction of a new policy for canceling brand names will play a positive role in regulating sales and balancing prices.
In short, the cancellation of the trade name and the implementation of a drug can only restore the original appearance of the pesticide. It can truly purify the pesticide market, create a safe drug use environment for consumers, and open up a healthy environment for the development of the enterprise.